1. The new evidence may the earlier conclusion. (challenge / touch)

2. The programme aims to barriers to participation. (reduce / make small)

3. The report several weaknesses in the current system. (identifies / sees)

4. The policy was after consultation with staff. (revised / changed around)

5. The results the need for further training. (highlight / show up)

6. The speaker the importance of regular practice. (emphasised / said strongly)

7. The data a gradual shift in learner preferences. (demonstrate / tell)

8. The two accounts on several key details. (diverge / go apart)

9. The new procedure should unnecessary delays. (eliminate / get rid of)

10. The author a convincing explanation for the change. (offers / gives out)

11. The evidence appears to the original claim. (contradict / go against)

12. The review will whether the programme met its goals. (determine / find out)

13. The changes were gradually over six months. (implemented / put in)

14. The report the issue from several perspectives. (examines / looks at)

15. The findings may a wider problem in the sector. (reflect / show back)

16. The organisation must resources carefully. (allocate / give around)

17. The evidence helps to the proposed approach. (validate / make right)

18. The author that the current model is too narrow. (contends / says)

19. The results should be with caution. (interpreted / understood)

20. The team hopes to a more effective strategy. (develop / make up)

21. The intervention was designed to learner confidence. (enhance / make better)

22. The survey useful information about student experiences. (yielded / made)

23. The report a number of practical recommendations. (outlines / talks about)

24. The evidence is with the earlier findings. (consistent / matching up)

25. The new approach may collaboration between teams. (facilitate / help happen)

26. The study the relationship between attendance and progress. (explores / looks around)

27. The author three main reasons for the decline. (attributes / puts)

28. The evidence is too limited to the claim. (substantiate / prove up)

29. The changes may existing inequalities. (exacerbate / make worse)

30. The new support system could some of these difficulties. (mitigate / make less bad)

31. Several sources the learner's account. (corroborate / agree with)

32. The report seeks to a clear framework for action. (establish / set up)

33. The researchers the data according to age group. (categorised / put into groups)

34. The policy should be regularly to ensure it remains relevant. (reviewed / looked at again)

35. The results considerable variation between groups. (reveal / let us see)

36. The proposal was because it lacked sufficient evidence. (rejected / said no to)

37. The study earlier work by adding new data. (extends / makes longer)

38. The writer should unsupported generalisations. (avoid / stay away from)

39. The evidence may a change in practice. (warrant / make okay)

40. The report the potential risks of the proposal. (acknowledges / admits to)

41. The researchers several variables during the experiment. (controlled / kept hold of)

42. The conclusion is from the evidence presented. (derived / got)

43. The new model elements from several approaches. (integrates / puts together)

44. The findings previous assumptions about the issue. (challenge / question at)

45. The report a distinction between short- and long-term effects. (draws / makes)

46. The author the argument with relevant examples. (reinforces / makes stronger)

47. The programme was in response to learner feedback. (modified / changed a bit)

48. The data must be accurately and transparently. (reported / told)

49. The discussion the findings within a broader context. (situates / puts)

50. The evidence is sufficiently strong to further investigation. (justify / make a reason for)